Posted by
QA Lady on Monday, December 25, 2006 11:23:50 AM
Nature's own Global Warming!
Recently there have been articles and reviews on the melting Arctic ice
and the warming temperatures. While we may blame humans for
"global warming," Nature itself has provide a much greater source of
greenhouse gases in the form of "Burning Ice" (Methane Hydrates) that
in the geological past have outgassed in massive amounts periodically
into the atmosphere. I will review the megatons of burning ice
later on, but first there is a technical scientific issue to resolve.
The issue of "global warming" brings up the need for good mathematics
in analyzing the various data sources to determine the true
causes-and-effects ("inputs" and "outputs") and to filter out those
causes that either do not affect the output, or in minor ways, or in
combined effects that do not show up until certain conditions are
correct. As I have spent time in R&D and also getting
my series of degrees, I have found that very few scientists and
researchers know how to use statistics properly to be able to filter
and view data for the actual, true cause-and-effects. Too many
times statistical regression methods are used that assume a direct
relationship between the causes and effect, which may not be
real. Although there are several books on the market, one of the
best books I know of that can help researchers, analysts, and
scientists is a book entitled, "Statistics for Experimenters," by Box,
Hunter, and Hunter.
When it comes to global warming, there are more causes than most
scientists have considered. For example, the increase in the
number and intensity of solar eruptions has a much higher statistical
correlation than the other causes/inputs. There are not many web
pages that show these in good ways, but here are two articles for
present the correlations rather easily.
http://www.qualitydigest.com/mar98/html/spctool.html
http://www.qualitydigest.com/april98/html/spctool.html
Although these graphs are from the late 1990s, the use of this type of
statistical tool, SPC charting, has hardly ever been used by scientific
researchers and investigators. Most of them have used other
mathematical methods that assume a direct correlation between
greenhouse gases and Global warming, as directed and determined by the
process modeler. This traditional "assumption" may not be
correct, and in some cases may potentially mislead scientists and
modelers. These other tools can allow a scientist to purposely
minimize the effects from natural causes and to maximize the effects of
human sources.
Some researchers say that they know all the effects that the increased
solar flux has on the atmosphere and have included this in their
models, and stated that there are no real effects from the solar
flux. But then there are other scientists with different theories
on the effects of increased flux that present different scenarios for
atmospheric reactions, such as the geomagnetic fields and changes,
volcanics and their outgassings, etc. You do not hear much in the
news about these other scientists and their results.
People should be very cautious about assuming that the global warming
"effect" is due solely to "greenhouse" gases. Also, it should be
noted that recent satellite data has shown that upper atmosphere is
actually cooling:
http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/pa/News/121699text.html
http://ees5-www.lanl.gov/IGPP/Debate2.html
(some of these links may not be working due to computer changes since 9-11)
Some researchers say that their theory and modeling shows that this
cooling should occur, while others show differing effects. We see
that there is still not complete agreements on the causes and
especially the effects of global warming. Then there are some
researchers who have purposely manipulated their models, formulas, and
analyses to purposely disregard all other inputs and only tie the
temperatures to greenhouse gases.
There is the other issue of how some scientists and researchers can
purposely change the structure of the formulas used in their models,
the mathematical terms used in the formulas, the parameters and scaling
factors in the formulas, and the values of any exponentials so as to
obtain predetermined results that the scientists wanted to get
anyway. This allows the scientist to minimize effects from
natural causes and to maximize the effects of human sources. This
is "tampering" with the formulas so as to get the predetermined results
that someone might want to get, no matter what the real processes are.
In my experiences in the scientific / R&D cultures, I have seen
this happen several times, even with Peer Reviews. Peer Reviews
are "supposed" to catch incorrect things, inconsistencies, and
errors. But this does not always occur. In some cases, the
scientific peers involved in those Peer Reviews also wanted "certain"
results to come out of the modeling and designs that they were
reviewing. In other cases, the peers were not paying attention to
critical items and issues.
Also the issue of temperature collection has not been properly
resolved. Temperatures are taken in cities that have the heat
island effect. I have seen several different approached to
handling and correcting these heat effects, but these approaches vary
and also give various results. Then there is the issue of
thermometer calibration. I have observed where some thermometers
for city temperatures were not calibrated properly at the required
intervals, and some times not calibrated at all. How can we trust
the temperature data if there are these variations in the instruments?
When it comes to Nature's greenhouse generators through the Burning Ice
(Methane Hydrates), we soon realize that our gases are very small when
compared to the megatons of methane hydrates that are held within our
oceans in a manner similar to a bathtub ring. Also the Earth has
had major accumulations and releases in its geological past over the
eons, some of which scientists now believe may have lead to some great
temperature increases in the Earth's past, long before humans were ever
around.
Let me give you some web sites that describe the characteristics and
issues with the Earth's Burning Ice and the natural abundance of
methane greenhouse gases:
General information on chemistry and biology of Methane Hydrates:
--> http://www.at-sea.org/missions/extremes/preview.html
--> http://www-ocean.tamu.edu/Quarterdeck/QD5.3/sassen.html
--> http://ench1.ench.ucalgary.ca/~hydrates/
--> http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/hydrates/
--> http://www.mbari.org/ghgases/
--> http://www.mbari.org/ghgases/geochem/gas_hydrates.htm
--> http://www.mbari.org/volcanism/Margin/Marg-Hydrates.htm
--> http://www.netl.doe.gov/scngo/NaturalGas/hydrates/index.html
U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) fact sheets:
--> http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/hydrates/
--> http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/gas-hydrates/title.html
--> http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs021-01/
--> http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/project-pages/hydrates/
Germany's research:
--> http://www.mpi-bremen.de/deutsch/biogeo/mumm2.html
--> http://www.gashydrate.de/
In the geological records and how dramatically and even violently the
climate has changed, long before modern man came around. There is
very strong geological and scientific evidence that the massive
Extinction in the Permian Era many millions of years ago in the Earth's
geological past was caused both by massive volcanism and by Methane
Hydrates.
http://www.terradaily.com/news/deepimpact-05r.html
Study breaks ice on ancient Arctic thaw:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Study_Breaks_Ice_On_Ancient_Arctic_Thaw_999.html
(previous periods of global warming)
And then there is the aspect of climate change from meteors:
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/climate-05zzzzo.html
Outgassing of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) from volcanoes:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs172-96/
Inaccuracies in measurements of climates:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Antarctic_Snow_Inaccurate_Temperature_Archive.html
Ancient Climate Studies Suggest Earth On Fast Track To Global Warming
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Ancient_Climate_Studies_Suggest_Earth_On_Fast_Track_To_Global_Warming.html
Green plants also cause Global Warming:
http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/22944/
http://www.germany-info.org/relaunch/info/publications/week/2006/060113/e-list.html#Wi1
http://www.terradaily.com/news/The_Forgotten_Methane_Source.html
http://www.terradaily.com/news/Could_Forests_Worsen_Global_Warming.html
http://www.terradaily.com/news/Extinctions_Linked_To_Climate_Change.html
Farming Provides Wildlife Habitat And Reduces Global Warming
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Farming_Provides_Wildlife_Habitat_And_Reduces_Global_Warming.html
Prehistoric warming helped preserve fossils:
http://www.terradaily.com/news/climate-05zzzzzi.html
Ancient tropical warming and nature's greenhouse gases
http://www.terradaily.com/news/climate-05zzzzzj.html
Volcanic impacts on ocean levels:
http://www.terradaily.com/news/oceans-05y.html
Climate change and massive flooding:
http://www.terradaily.com/news/The_Role_Of_Massive_Floods_In_Climate_Change.html
Late Pleistocene Americans Faced Chaotic Climate Change Environments:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Late_Pleistocene_Americans_Faced_Chaotic_Climate_Change_Environments.html
Global Warming evidence from 55 million years ago:
http://www.terradaily.com/news/climate-05zzzzzzb.html
Tropical ice cores shows two abrupt Global Climate shifts:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Tropical_Ice_Cores_Shows_Two_Abrupt_Global_Climate_Shifts_999.html
How continental splits resulted in global cooling:
http://www.terradaily.com/news/antarctic-05q.html
Earth's burping from wobbling also affects climate:
http://www.terradaily.com/news/climate-05zzzzt.html
Geomagnetism as one factor in rain / weather:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Magnets_Help_Explain_Rain_Patterns.html
None of the environmentalists or businesses involved in reducing carbon
emissions can go and blame massive climate changes in the past on power
plants and vehicles!
It is not wise to make international policies on theories that are not
agreed upon by the scientists who have been studying these causes and
effects. Other scientists have published their works dealing with
other causes, but have not been given the publicity such as the US
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) has received.
But if the Solar Sun is the major, primary cause and we are just a
minor contributor, then our Governments are imposing on us a major
compliance issue that will NOT solve the problem. Control of
carbon emissions does NOT equal Control of the Solar Sun and its flux
intensities on us. Several environmental groups have told us and
openly admitted at other times that they want to use the idea of human
sources in order to shut down industrial activities -- their words, not
ours.
Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.